Signup to our newsletter
Our Site Sponsors
 newsponsorlogo
Vote in our poll

Should the government now honour its pre-election pledge to fund more midwives?
 

 
 

RCM CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT STATS

The rise in midwife numbers is happening "despite not because of the Prime Minister callously ditching his pre-election pledge" according to Royal College of Midwives general secretary Louise Silverton.

An additional 896 midwives were in post in November, compared to March 2011, the Conservatives have said.

This equates to a rise of nearly five per cent – but still falls far short of the government’s election promise to get an additional 3,000 midwives in post or education.

The Government appeared to rush out these figures in reaction to former Unison official June Hautot's harranging of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley earlier this week (watch ITN news clip).

Yet Health minister Simon Burns was quick to point out: “Despite Labour’s constant scaremongering, these figures are clear proof that the NHS is moving forwards under the Coalition.

“Labour doubled the number of managers, tied up doctors and nurses in red tape, and left behind a £20 billion black hole in the NHS budget. We are changing that by cutting NHS bureaucracy, increasing investment and making sure that more money gets straight to the frontline.”

However, Silverton has hit back, suggesting the increase in midwives are in spite of cuts, and not down to any particular Conservative strategy.

"The numbers of midwives may well be up – that’s thanks to NHS Trusts responding to both the rising number and the increasing complexity of births," she said.

"The NHS was, in 2010, short of around 4,700 full-time midwives. We will need to wait for the official 2011 birth figures to come out to get a more up-to-date assessment of the current situation. If births are rising faster than midwife numbers then, regardless of this rise, the shortage of midwives will be getting worse, not better."

Click here to add your name to the RCM's e-petition calling for 5,000 more midwives.

Posted by Robert Mair on 22/2/2012, picture courtesy www.leftfootforward.org 


Article Last Updated: 23/02/2012

Comments on this article

Add comment
   
  • What do you think that other wtseern european countries do not use advanced techniques for premmies? FYU the most advanced specialist in premmie care I had ever met as a Spaniard who worked for their national health service. They were on the cutting edge in his unit let me tell yout that. It is funny who some people in this forum seems to be squirming and looking for excuses and claiming that the numbers are skewed by all kinds of specifically american factors. That is simply not true. All numbers in all countries are affected by local factors but the US health numbers are so bad all accross the board when compared with the other developed nations that they are extremely hard to justify. What is it then? if it is not a badly functioning health care system. Are americans genetically deficient? Is the environment specially unhealthy? Besides the number I have been used are "adjusted" numbers the WHO reports not the numbers the countries themselves report. The WHO adjusts the numbers the countries report to make them fit a common set of criteria precisely to make them comparable.

    Added by: Simon on 01/03/2012 - 23:55

You are not logged in

 newschoolhealth